hjmejm37 hjmejm37

01-03-2021
History

contestada

who believed a bill of rights would be redundant and unnecessary- federalists or antifederalists

Respuesta :

emarithomas32 emarithomas32

01-03-2021

Answer:

The Federalist

Explanation:

They argued that the constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any power not given to the federal government.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Stevie and Michael share their profit in a ratio 3:5. Stevie gets £120 more than Michael. How much profit did they make altogether?

Hey, guys, I need help please give an answer and a good explanation thank you. 0.75-0.25+1/2=

A goalie kicks a soccer ball straight vertically into the air. It takes 5.00 s for the ball to reach its maximum height and come back down to the level of the c

Value of g in CGS system

What is the equation of the graph? A. y=4x B. y= 1/4x C. y=-1/4x D. y= -4x

who of the following review Tagore gitanjali in 1913

A science test, which is worth 100 points, consists of 24 questions. Each question is worth either 3 points or 5 points. If x is the number of 3-point questions

Skyline Builders and Pine Lumber had a contract, calling for Pine Lumber to deliver a certain quantity of bricks to Skyline's place of business on the first of

hey guys plz help meeethe answers have to be in numbers.

Match each example of figurative language with its interpretation. “He watches from his mountain walls, And like a thunderbolt he falls.” A) These lines give hu